Arvin Gouw, PhD is the vice president for research and development overseeing the BeHEARD (Help Empower & Accelerate Research Discoveries) and RGTF (Rare Genomics Task Force) divisions of Rare Genomics Institute, where he leads crowdfunding efforts for rare disease personalized medicine research, predominantly for children, and develops novel online and mobile platforms to connect patients to medical experts. Arvin is currently a fellow at Stanford and Berkeley studying the role of metabolism in cancer and stem cells, where his work is under the entrepreneurship program of SPARK at Stanford, while leading the entrepreneurship program, BPEP (Berkeley Postdoc Entrepreneur Program) at Berkeley. He is also an affiliate faculty at Harvard, given his interest in the intersection between science, policy and religion regarding genomics ethics. Prior to Stanford, he served as associate pastor in Philadelphia, during which he did his fellowship on science and theology at Princeton Theological Seminary. Arvin received his Ph.D. in pathobiology from Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, M.Phil in philosophy from University of Pennsylvania, M.A. in theology from the Ecumenical Institute of Theology of St. Mary’s Seminary & University, M.A. in endocrinology and B.A. in molecular biology both from UC Berkeley.

Genetic Engineering For The Rest of Us

November 21, 2019 by Arvin Gouw, PhD, Megan Powell Cuzzolino, Rev. Zachary Jackson, Stefanie West Leacock, PhD

Audio
0 0

How we can teach so many of the complicated nuances of genetics to laypeople, clergy, students, and others who may be new to the big debates?

The CRISPR Advent of Lulu and Nana

April 18, 2019 by Arvin Gouw, PhD

We presume a unique place for ourselves in creation for having been created in the image of God. But what constitutes that image of God?

Climate Change as a Story

November 8, 2018 by Arvin Gouw, PhD, Brian Gallagher, Dr. Adam Pryor, Kendra Holt Moore, Rabbi Rachael Jackson, Rev. Dr. Ruth Shaver, Rev. Zachary Jackson, Timothy Maness

Big Stories, like the ones forged by religion, could be a powerful motivator for climate action. How might we use this way of thinking to spur action while staying scientific?