How much of science is a pursuit of truth for its own sake? And what happens when it leads to unanticipated consequences?
We presume a unique place for ourselves in creation for having been created in the image of God. But what constitutes that image of God?
Topics such as human evolution and climate change are of interest to me – but the very act of tweeting about them comes across as politically or religiously motivated.
I have a confession to make: I’m enjoying the illusion of consciousness. I’m enjoying the illusion of life.
Science demands proof for what it believes. But there is something that scientists believe without proof, and that cannot be proved: the central doctrine of science.
What would the earth, and the spirit of humanity, look like if the Fall had never happened?
How might thinking in a “Godly time-frame” help us take more urgent action about issues affecting us right now?
How might we help others see themselves as vulnerable climate change, but also empowered to do something about it?
As a scientist, it takes years of training and failing, and occasionally succeeding, to become comfortable with knowing that some day you might be proven wrong. How different that looks through the lens of faith!
Myriam Renaud and Dr. Michael Summers discuss the awe-inspiring uniqueness of the Earth in the universe.